What kinds of restrictions on public carry remain presumptively permissible?
Carrying guns may be prohibited in “sensitive places” like schools and government buildings. It remains “settled” that the Second Amendment allows restrictions on carrying guns in “sensitive places” like schools, government buildings, courthouses, and polling sites. (p. 21). The Supreme Court acknowledged that similar restrictions may be imposed for “new and analogous sensitive places.” (p. 21). However, the Court warned that an entire geographic area, such as the whole “island of Manhattan,” could not be declared a “sensitive place” solely on the ground that it is crowded and well-policed. (p. 22). Consistent with this, the state legislature and municipal authorities may expand the list of specific public spaces where carrying handguns and other weapons is prohibited.
Licenses may still be required for carrying handguns in public, and those licenses may be reserved only for responsible, law-abiding individuals. Fingerprinting, background checks, mental-health checks, and training courses all remain presumptively permissible. (p. 30).
Dangerous or unusual weapons may be subject to further restrictions. The Court did not define what a dangerous or unusual weapon may be, leaving some ambiguity on this point, but certain restrictions remain presumptively permissible. (p. 38).
Carrying guns with unlawful intent may be prohibited. While the Court held that the Second Amendment protects a law-abiding citizen’s right to carry a concealed handgun in public for lawful self-defense purposes, restrictions on carrying guns with unlawful intent remain presumptively permissible. (pp. 29, 62).
Financial incentives for responsible arms carrying may be devised. (p. 51).
Private parties may restrict guns on their own property. Nothing in Bruen requires private parties to allow guns into their own homes or businesses if they do not want them there.